Productos>Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology

Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology

Editorial:

Edición digital Logos

Ediciones Logos están totalmente conectados a su biblioteca y a sus herramientas de estudio de la Biblia.
Actualmente este producto no está disponible para ser comprado.

Overview

John Walton presents comparative studies of ancient texts and their cosmologies. The first half of the book focuses on the ancient texts that inform our understanding of Near Eastern cosmology. Egyptian, Sumerian, and Akkadian texts are the primary focus, but occasionally Ugaritic and Hittite are included as appropriate. Walton posits that functional ontology was pervasive in ancient writing because bringing about order and functionality was the very essence of creative activity.

The second half of the book is devoted to a fresh analysis of Genesis 1:1–2:4. Walton studies significant Hebrew terms and shows that, like the rest of the ancient Near East, the Israelite texts use a functional cosmology that is constructed with temple ideology in mind. He contends that Genesis 1 was never an account of material origins but that, as in the rest of the ancient world, the purpose of this “creation text” was to outline functions for the components of the cosmos. All of this demonstrates that, when we read Genesis 1 as the ancient document it is rather than trying to read it in light of our current world view, the text recovers the energy it had in its original context. At the same time, it provides a new perspective on Genesis 1 in relation to what have long been controversial issues.

In the Logos edition, this volume is enhanced by amazing functionality. Important terms link to dictionaries, encyclopedias, and a wealth of other resources in your digital library. Perform powerful searches to find exactly what you’re looking for. Take the discussion with you using tablet and mobile apps. With Logos Bible Software, the most efficient and comprehensive research tools are in one place, so you get the most out of your study.

Interested in more? Be sure to check out the Eisenbrauns Old Testament Studies Collection (3 vols.).

Product Details

About the Author

John H. Walton is a professor of Old Testament at Wheaton College Graduate School. Before teaching at Wheaton, Walton taught at Moody Bible Institute for 20 years.

Top Highlights

“The model of the cosmos as a kingdom was more relevant in the ancient world than our modern model of the cosmos, which typically portrays it as a machine.” (Page 9)

“I posit that, in the ancient world, bringing about order and functionality was the very essence of creative activity.” (Page viii)

“‘We ought then to think of creation in terms of functions rather than material objects.’” (Page vii)

“I will suggest that cosmic ontology in the ancient world was a functional ontology—that is, everything exists by virtue of its having been assigned a function and given a role in the ordered cosmos.” (Page 24)

“One of the most important of these issues is the concept of divine rest—the idea that deities in the ANE find rest in temples and that temples are built for the deity to rest in.” (Page 10)

Opiniones

Valoraciones de 22

Inicie sesión con su cuenta Logos

  1. The Mangolorian

    The Mangolorian

    23/06/2022

    disappointing...
  2. Reuven Milles

    Reuven Milles

    14/03/2021

  3. Michael Wingrove
    When I read books by academia who seek to interpret Scripture through comparative ancient religious studies as their primary hermeneutical method, I always think of how church archaeologists would use the same methods on our own period if they shared Walton's views If they should find a horde of Mormon texts, they might compare the Bible and especially American Evangelicalism to those same texts and use them to accommodate the Bible to perhaps a popular view that Jesus wasn't God, Or, even better, they should examine the religious texts of Islam and assume that the Koran was the source of or prior to the Old Testament. Sadly, writers like Walton hide their real intention to make the Bible "modern" by misdirecting the readers into thinking that he is telling it what it really meant to the Jewish people or whoever it was the book was written for. While there are many similarities between Genesis and other literature of contemporary cultures, the differences are too great to really help that much in interpretation. Despite their protests, authors like Walton are really colonial conquistadors of the ancient text of the Bible
  4. Dr. Elliott Mallory-Greene
  5. John Sheeley

    John Sheeley

    26/07/2017

    Seriously? "The most important result of this study for the interpretation of Genesis is the realization that the Genesis account pertains to functional origins rather than material origins and that temple ideology underlies the Genesis cosmology." (198–199). This book goes to great lengths to destroy the literal six day creation account and make it in line with other ANE pagan views of creation in order to satisfy those who hold to evolutionary ideas and an old earth. Walton's arguments compromise the integrity of Scripture and deny the something from nothing aspect of creation as given in Genesis 1. This book should not be used as a preaching resource other than to note the false arguments given by those who try to placate the evolutionist.
  6. Chris

    Chris

    24/06/2017

  7. Mark D. Anderson
  8. Ong Jian Ming

    Ong Jian Ming

    27/01/2017

  9. Alexander C. Stewart
  10. Dr. Johnny Nix
Actualmente este producto no está disponible para ser comprado.